Saturday, July 9, 2016

KISS (Keep it simple Saved)

Dispensationalism, Calvinism, Arminianism, Evangelical, Reform, Post-Trib/Pre-Trib. If you clearly understand the meaning behind these words and concepts; you're smarter than I am (which isn't a huge compliment, but that's another subject altogether). I would posit that "ignorance is bliss" is an expression that applies here, as for the most part, when I started exploring these (and a myriad of other terms/concepts), winsome is not a word that would describe how I felt. This stuff can make you crazy! And it's all so unnecessary.

It's been said that God's Word (The Bible), is so simple that a child can understand it; but so deep that no man can plumb it's depth. With that, I would advise more people to spend more time wading and less time SCUBA diving. That is to say: let's stay with the basics, and leave the "high theology" to those who can handle it. By handle it, I mean that one can enjoy the mental gymnastics of studying, but at the end of the day the only thing we need to really understand is what Jesus did on the Cross for us. It doesn't matter where you stand regarding the aforementioned in the opening paragraph. Most who identify themselves or relate to the subjects mentioned will still concede that you can hold a different, even contrary view, and still be a Christian.

My experience has demonstrated that delving into these deep theological waters often leads to confusion (at best), or a smug, self-righteous attitude (at worst). The Devil must be a big fan of the quandary produced by this dynamic. Either way; he wins. Both confusion and smugness produce "distracted" Christians. It's the time-worn strategy: 'Divide and Conquer' (in my opinion, the same result often produced by denominations). Any way you can fracture cohesiveness and get people to fight among themselves, not against you (Devil); you win. These, and other distinctions often lead to splintering. So you end up with Lutherans vs Methodists, Baptists vs Presbyterians, KJO vs NIV, traditional vs contemporary, reform vs Calvinism - and on it goes.

Instead of all Christians of any "stripe" coming together to evangelize and fight against the powers of darkness and all manner of sin (pornography, alcohol, blasphemy, fornication, etc.), we debate and ridicule each other over these differences. I would agree with the statement: “In essentials – unity; non-essentials – liberty; in all things – charity”. And as far as I’m concerned, anything other than believing/accepting/applying what Jesus did by rising from the grave to free us from sin and give us eternal life in Heaven: is a non-essential! Even more precise: the only essential is believing why His tomb was/is empty.

Charles Spurgeon’s view on John Wesley demonstrates the attitude we all need to adopt. Spurgeon (an admitted Calvinist), and Wesley (whom many felt represented the antithesis of Calvinism), were worlds apart on many doctrinal issues. But Spurgeon writes of his enormous respect for Wesley as a man of God, and states he is sure that Heaven is not reserved exclusively for Calvinistic Christians. Point to be taken here is that if one as Godly and theologically brilliant as Spurgeon realizes that Christians who fall on different sides of so many issues that we take so seriously can all be saved and meet in Heaven; so should we. We see through a glass darkly, so we shouldn’t expect to figure it all out this side of Glory.

This is not to say doctrine doesn’t matter; because it does. It’s just that not all doctrine matters. It doesn’t all carry the same weight. It’s not all essential doctrine. For example: if from the same pulpit you hear the doctrine of the Virgin Birth and that women should only wear long hair and skirts; I think you can comfortably stay there, even if you disagree with the latter position: it’s a non-essential. And if the congregants were of the proper spirit; they would not think you less of a Christian because of it. If, however, you hear from the same pulpit that God was not born of a virgin, it doesn’t matter what they’re stance is regarding women’s hair and dress. The stance on an essential doctrine is un-Biblical. Which leads to another indicator of whether something is essential or not. As the saying goes, “The main things are the plain things”. This is no less true for the Bible. Who Jesus is, what He accomplished for us, how we know the Bible is the word of God – these are all very main and very plain. Eternal security, irresistible grace, free-will vs God’s sovereignty; whether these are main or plain, are dependent on your view. Many very smart, very godly people have spent years studying these issues and come to different conclusions.

So what is a body to do?

Be a slave to your Master; do what He would have you to do. Read your Bible and get some good commentaries to assist. Pray that God illuminates His Word to you. Surround yourself with authentic Christians who have accepted Jesus as Savior and Lord (you will know them by their fruits). Be light in this dark world. It’s not rocket science. It’s often not easy, but it’s not rocket science.



Thursday, June 16, 2016

A Need to Know Basis?

In what admittedly could be irony of the highest degree, I want to discuss (via my blog – on the computer), why technology (especially information technology, personal access to the internet), has reached a point of diminishing returns. In fact, it would not be hard to convince me that the internet never had an upside in the sense that it created at least as many problems as advantages, right from the start. This is coming from one who clearly understands the wonderful aspects of the web such as exposure to much that is edifying that otherwise may have remained hidden. But, as wonderful as that may be, I don't think it is worth the cost of negative exposure that is almost impossible to avoid.

For a long time I felt that I was born at least one generation too late (leave my family/friends out of the equation for the sake of the larger point). My feeling is that the 1940’s/50’s might have been the high-point where technology and morality meet. Meaning we had many “modern” conveniences well established (phone, washer/dryers, automobiles, plane travel, medical advances etc.), that made life more pleasant, and people still were infused with love of God, family, country; exhibiting a strong work ethic and hope for the future. Of course, we had many things still wrong such as more widespread (or at least open), acceptance of bigotry, drinking and smoking. I’m not sure these three things have actually decreased as opposed to just “going under the radar” or losing some of their panache. People of all eras are fallen sinners and find a myriad ways of hurting themselves and others, but I’m trying to establish a point where the “coaster” reaches the top before it starts hurtling down. As Robert Bork’s fantastic book Slouching Toward Gomorrah illustrates, we have been heading in this direction for a long time. I would suggest we are no longer slouching, but sprinting toward Gomorrah. Much of this can be laid at the doorstep of information technology.
Growing up in the 60’s (I just missed it!), information technology pretty much consisted of phone, radio, TV, and often only one of each in a household. Of course, as the decade moved on, it wasn’t unusual to find more than one of these items in a house. However, when the norm was only one of these items per household, you had the advantage of monitoring what was being viewed/heard/said, and (in the case of radio/tv), often it meant family time as all gathered to enjoy a program. I’m not giving total carte blanche to the programmers and broadcasters of the early eras, as even programming back then could often pander to the lowest common denominator. But only a fool or a liar would deny that those mediums today pander much worse trash than ever before. In addition, phones were for talking to someone when distance/time made in-person contact impractical or impossible.

Now phones are multi-media devices that put the internet (and all its snares), right at your fingertips. TVs and radios have hundreds of channels (many of them outright pornographic and reprobate in their programming). People will take me to task defending this “freedom” and pointing out the many “positives” of today’s programming (History channel and other “educational” type channels for instance), but it’s just a smoke screen. Anyone who would defend such a proliferation of garbage under the guise that there is some good, is only convicting themselves of their desire for the trash. These are the ones that make advertisers rich that promote reality shows, sitcoms, movies, UFC, and anything else that promotes promiscuity, violence, sloth, selfishness – pretty much the vast majority of programming. Any God-fearing sincere Christian would gladly go back to rabbit-ear antennae and 6 channels if it meant the elimination of the filth. The main reason that I am able to speak with knowledge of this subject is that as a Born-again, new creature in Christ; I’m in the world, but not of the world. Being in it, and the spiritual leader (and watchdog), of my family; it is my responsibility to be aware of the dangers and snares that confront us. We got rid of our cable almost 10 years ago, when our children were young; so I have put my money where my mouth is. Unfortunately, I work in an environment where cable is constantly available and watched (I have very little say in the matter), but it does allow me to stay more current on the downward spiral.

This leads me into the internet, which I will treat all-inclusive, via desk-top, or any wireless device (especially phones). Even internet (admittedly, almost exclusively negative from my perspective), had a more palatable beginning when homes had one computer that all had to share. But in a short time (as is typical with information technology), things changed; of course for the worse. More and more evil became more available on more and more different devices. Today, most families have multiple personal devices to pursue (typically), what John Colwell referred to in 1882 as “Little Foxes”; those little sins that people allow, as in their mind, they aren’t that bad. Whether these “little foxes” be gossip (reality TV), greed (reality TV), sloth (reality TV) – are we seeing a pattern here? And all manner of such that plasters the internet from You Tube to endless web-sites. I would like to think that Colwell would agree that nowadays people are carrying around not just little foxes but big wolves in their personal devices. People are not embarrassed to enjoy/show you all kinds of sin on their phone, from sex to violence. Not involving them of course (not that that doesn’t occur, but thank God I haven’t experienced it), but others involved in all forms of idiocy and reprobate behavior. It’s bad enough that anyone wants to see that, but why do you think I want to? I guess I better check my witness and ramp it up!

Don’t try to sell me on the advantages outweighing the disadvantages – it just isn’t so. The only advantage I will concede, would be expediency. And even then I don’t think getting information faster/easier is always better. People used to gather all the useful info. they needed from conversation, libraries, encyclopedias and such. In fact, the internet is simply a repository of all things gathered from these sources. We became a great nation, and reached the pinnacle of our “greatness” before the internet even existed. The argument could be made that the internet has contributed to our fall from greatness; certainly to our fall from Grace!

I have a 1930’s Remington typewriter that I would (and have), gladly use if that was the trade-off to make computers and the internet go away. I could still indulge my enjoyment of writing, but we would be unencumbered by all the instant “celebrities” (especially in their own minds), that exist today because of Twitter and blogs (yeah, me too – I’m very famous as I have maybe 6 followers including my family). I do this first and always to glorify my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, from whom all good things come. It gives me a vehicle to share my faith and my opinions (which I can be confident of, as they align with God’s Word).

Referring back to the end of my first paragraph, I will use the example of guns. Of course it’s a simplistic illustration, but I like simple. The world would be a better place without guns. I work in law enforcement, I own guns, but I am not a hypocrite. If guns didn’t exist, you wouldn’t have nuts killing large numbers of people in a short amount of time. It all comes down to that; there is no rebuttal to this. Yeah, you would still have murders and such, but you can’t conduct a mass killing on the scale we experience all too frequently with a club, knife, or bow and arrow; you just can’t. Same dynamic applies to the internet. You could not have mass exposure to all matter of sin without it. When men (almost exclusively; not boys or women or girls), had to go someplace to pursue their sin, you had less exposure to things (and even less or no exposure to types of things), then is available at the fingertips of any man, woman, or child who has a wireless device.

In the past, pursuing sin took effort; a good thing since people with a reprobate bent are often lazy. And in theory, a person might never even be exposed to something that could become a lifelong battle for them. But these days, you could “innocently” stumble onto a site that you would never intentionally seek out. Unfortunately, you can’t un-see something, and it could start a harmful pattern in one’s life. Information technology has brought the slime up to the surface when it used to be down in the dark where it belongs, so, on the balance, it’s not progress; it’s regression.

One of my modern heroes of the faith, John Macarthur, has made the point that too many people are exposed to too much tragedy, violence, and other negativity that a person could go an entire lifetime without experiencing; if it weren’t for the internet. Stuff that only people involved in the military, law enforcement, medical staff, etc. would have any knowledge of in the past. I agree. We have access 24/7  to instant tragedy or dysfunction; what is the benefit of this? Being aware of such calamity certainly has not decreased it's proliferation. I believe it's accelerated it!

A little self-disclosure before I finish. Yes, we too have multiple devices:  (2) desktops, laptop, tablet, (1) iphone, and (2) flip-phones. These are shared (as is our very modest plan of 600 mins, 2000 texts, 1 GB), between two adults and two teenagers). The iphone is mine and of course the other phones have no internet and are really only relegated to necessary use when we travel in different directions. We don’t participate in any kind of social media. We only have the second desktop due to upgrading our computer. It is seldom used. The laptop is my daughter’s and is essential as she writes her own Christian blog. The tablet was given to us. Our main desktop is in a common area and my wife and I are very aware of the usage on all devices. As I mentioned earlier; we have not had cable, dish, or any kind of television programming for almost ten years. So, in a sense, due to the times and culture we live in, some of these are necessary evils. The key is that we control them, they don’t control us. You can too!


It’s time to take out the trash.

Sunday, May 15, 2016

Wanna Bet?

It’s been a busy month, as indicated by my absence of a post (yeah, I know, the world has kept on turning anywayJ).  Blogging definitely has turned out to be more of an exercise of discipline than I had thought, but still a labor of love and what God has me to do.
I don’t tire of telling people that being a Christian comes with a cost. Ironically it’s only a cost if you look at it the wrong way. Jesus shows us the only way that we should conduct ourselves if we are to receive the full benefit of being His. So the stuff we have to avoid/give-up only drags us down (literally), in the end. Accepting what God did on the cross through Jesus is like winning all the power-balls ever won and doesn’t cost us a dime!
Google "Pascal’s Wager". Posited by 17th century philosopher (among other things), Blaise Pascal, it basically says people bet their lives on whether the Christian God exists or not. Because Jesus is the only way to the father (God), to reject this is to risk eternity in Hell, if you at least allow the probability of Jesus’s claims to be true. Of course, logic alone has to allow for the possibility of it being true, as no one can prove otherwise, and if you allow for the “many roads to God” baloney, you have to give equal time to the one and only road view; you have to be consistent.
I agree with Pascal on the basis of the crux of his argument alone (being a born-again believer it’s a moot point, but a valid one). That is, why not live like God exists and follow his rules, because doing so will guarantee your eternity in Heaven. In the meantime you can enjoy all the beauty and joy this world allows through God’s general blessings. Things like springtime, pristine lakes, baseball, tennis, summer concerts under the stars (Vivaldi, not AC/DC), being in love, babies, comfort from friends in times of grief (and any other of countless things people enjoy or benefit from); these are all blessings even non-believers enjoy (although not to the fullest, as they know not where they originate). As C.S. Lewis expressed it: if you focus on just worldly happiness; you will be disappointed, and you will never see Heaven. But, if you understand eternal happiness as Jesus represents, you will get Heaven and the temporal world will be thrown in.
The last few weeks (as have all my years on this planet), have demonstrated God’s endless love and blessings. I’ve grown comfortable and content in a new job, my children have been busy with projects and looking forward to the warmer weather and beauty that spring in Michigan brings, did a 10k with life-long friends, approaching 20 year anniversary with the love of my life, and too many other things to mention. Like everyone else on this fallen planet, there have also been disappointments, worry, anger, uncertainty, but unlike those without faith; they are like water off a duck’s back, as I know God always provides a way to overcome these transient challenges (that are typically self-created anyway).
In the meantime, what have I given up, as my sanctification continues?  I’ve given up:
·         Getting drunk on alcohol
·         Gossiping (running other people down)
·         Profanity
·         Pornography
·         Dishonesty/cheating
·         Rudeness
·         Selfishness
Of course, this is not an exhaustive list, and none of us sinners are perfect,  but I can assure you that these, along with other “costs” are the best bargain there is!
What I’ve gained is God’s favor and assurance that not only will I be with Jesus for eternity, but that I know how to navigate my way in this world of groaning and travail.
All God asks in return is all your life. Not just on Sunday (for those that even go to church), but every thought and action of every waking moment. Think of your spouse. Would you be happy if they only acted like your spouse when you were together. but when they were at work, or with friends, or wherever, they acted like they were single? Now, unless you’re in some of weird open time of relationship (it sure couldn’t called Biblical marriage), I think we all know what the answer would be.
Do you think God is any different? How do those that act like God is only important when it’s convenient/expected (weddings, funerals, church, tragedy) think He feels when they conduct themselves most of the time like he doesn’t exist? If they do, then they truly must not be his sheep, as they aren’t hearing his voice, or choosing to ignore it. The Sheep heed the Shepherd’s voice, and the slaves do the will of the Master.
So yes we are to be Sheep/Slaves when it comes to doing the will of the Father. This doesn’t entail all the negative images that people attach. When your Master is all-wise and loving, there is no trepidation in doing His will that is clearly laid out in the Bible. Besides, you can do His will and still enjoy life. In fact, doing His will is the only way to enjoy life to the fullest! Most everyone I know who need to make Jesus the Lord of their lives would not have to make drastic changes in their day to day activities. They could go on at the same jobs (none are pornographers or used car salesman), they could still take trips and have nice things. However, everything you do and say has to be put through the prism that allows us to see things (as is humanly possible), as God sees them. For instance, one might have to reevaluate how they behave at work, and everywhere else. Dress, speech, entertainment, associations all have to meet the litmus test. If you find yourself in a situation that fails this test; don’t panic. You don’t have to scream and run the opposite direction (although, that might be the better choice than doing nothing). Just remove yourself from the situation physically, or at least emotionally, by not participating.
I’ve actually come to enjoy the awkwardness created when I’m around those who know I’m a Christian, and they feel the need to adjust the conversation or perhaps apologize for language that may be used. Not because I want them to feel awkward (convicted perhaps), but because it indicates that I’m not hiding my Light under a bushel; that I’m walking the walk and not just talking the talk. It’s nice that they do this out of consideration for me; not because I demand it. If I did, I suspect they would just stop having me around. I like to refer to it as the “Grandma Effect”. Very often (unless you’re really a reprobate), if you ask someone who’s acting inappropriately, if they would behave that way in front of their Grandma; they’d say “…no way”. Well, consider God as Grandma times infinity, and ask yourself why is it okay to do some of the things you do when God does know what you’re doing. Of course, this has flaws as most everyone believes in grandmothers, but not everyone believes in Jesus, but you get the drift.


So all of you out there who are always looking for the best deals and return on your investment on tangible stuff that will one day go to someone else or deteriorate into garbage need to apply that thinking to your eternal soul. Realize that a relationship with Jesus is a full-time commitment that you should be proud of enough to share with others. Granted, this doesn’t happen right away with everyone, but it will come as you grow in your faith. You can still be you, with your personality, skills, preferences, etc., but you’ll be the best you ever!